Last updated:
On August 7, 2012, HarrisMartin published an article regarding the recent resolution of three separate Plaintiffs’ claims against DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. regarding the ASR hip device. A December 3, 2012 trial date had been set for these three Plaintiffs in a Nevada state court. They could have potentially been the first ASR hip cases to go to trial.
The three Plaintiffs, Martha Bender, Katherine Guy, and Anneliese Rundle, asserted numerous causes of actions in their complaint against DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and against Precision Orthopaedics, Inc., a Nevada distributor of the ASR hip devices. These causes of action included strict liability, negligence, deceptive trade practices, failure to warn, and concealment of risk.
The exact details regarding the resolution and the settlement amount of these three claims were not disclosed by either side in the litigation. The resolution of claims brought by the three Plaintiffs was noted in the June 27th minutes of a meeting with the judge overseeing the cases. The cases were to be tried in Clark County District Court.
Hurt in a dangerous drugs & devices situation?
Talk directly with John David Hart — board-certified Texas trial lawyer. Free, confidential, no fee unless we win.
Get a Free Case Review Call 817-870-2102More on Dangerous Drugs & Devices
How we handle Dangerous Drugs & Devices →Good News for EpiPen® Auto-Injector Users and Families!
Mylan today issued a statement announcing that it is taking immediate action to increase access to EpiPen® Auto-Injectors by expanding already existing…
Continue reading »Outrageous
In an August 22, 2016, New York Times article, Tara Parker-Pope and Rachel Rabkin Peachman reported on the steep increase in the…
Continue reading »Is It Possible to Keep Up with Product Recalls?
How do we stay safe and keep our families safe when products we use are recalled for safety reasons? Safety recalls are…
Continue reading »